Thursday, October 12, 2006

for want of a shoe

i once watched this ridiculous episode of sex and the city. You’ve probably watched it too. If you haven’t, good on you. I was forced to, it was part of the course syllabus for a film and tv module. In the episode, sarah jessica parker’s manolos go missing at a friend’s party. She demands compensation, in fact a new pair of the same shoe. Her logic goes something along the lines of how since she’s single, has no kids, she deserves getting shoes back from this friend of hers, who has along the way gotten wedding gifts and kids’ gifts. go figure.

3 comments:

S said...

if i remember correctly, carrie was pissed because that other woman criticized her decision for buying a pair of shoes that was worth 500 dollars. she said it in a very condescending tone too, implying that just because carrie was still single with no man and children, she had no life.

S said...

AND the worst part was, her friend MADE her take out her shoes. so of course she deserves the compensation, imho.

min said...

i love that part of the show!!!!!!!

and love the shoes!! it goes so famous, that pair of manolos